NEWS >> << NEWS
Return to Home Page

Introduction to
Service-Orientation
    Services (Part I)
    Services (Part II)
    The Service-Orientation
Design Paradigm
    Origins and Influences of Service-Orientation (Part I)
    Origins and Influences of Service-Orientation (Part II)

Service-Orientation
Design Principles
    Standardized Service Contracts
    Service Loose Coupling
    Service Abstraction
    Service Reusability
    Service Autonomy
    Service Statelessness
    Service Discoverability
    Service Composability
    Service-Orientation and Interoperability

Effects of Service-Orientation on the Enterprise
    Service-Orientation and the Concept of "Application"
    Service-Orientation and the Concept of "Integration"
    The Service Composition

Service-Orientation
in the Real World
    Life Before
Service-Orientation (Part I)
    Life Before
Service-Orientation (Part II)
    The Need for
Service-Orientation (Part I)
    The Need for
Service-Orientation (Part II)
    Challenges Introduced by Service-Orientation (Part I)
    Challenges Introduced by Service-Orientation (Part II)
    Additional Considerations

Resources
    SOA Book Series
    SOA Training & Certification
    Free SOA Principles Poster
    Notification
    SOAPatterns.org
    WhatIsSOA.com
    SOA Visio Stencil


Service Loose Coupling

"Service contracts impose low consumer coupling requirements and
are themselves decoupled from their surrounding environment."


Home > Service-Orientation Design Principles > Service Loose Coupling

Audio Podcast
The first four principles are discussed in the audio podcast Introduction to Service-Orientation Design Principles - Part 1
Coupling refers to a connection or relationship between two things. A measure of coupling is comparable to a level of dependency. This principle advocates the creation of a specific type of relationship within and outside of service boundaries, with a constant emphasis on reducing (“loosening”) dependencies between the service contract, its implementation, and its service consumers.

The principle of Service Loose Coupling promotes the independent design and evolution of a service’s logic and implementation while still guaranteeing baseline interoperability with consumers that have come to rely on the service’s capabilities. There are numerous types of coupling involved in the design of a service, each of which can impact the content and granularity of its contract. Achieving the appropriate level of coupling requires that practical considerations be balanced against various service design preferences.


Figure: Coupling represents a core design consideration that spans both intra and inter-service design.

Chapter 7: Service Coupling (Intra-Service and Consumer Dependencies) provides an in-depth exploration of this principle and introduces related patterns and concepts.

Related Service-Orientation Computing Goals

Increased Intrinsic Interoperability, Increased Federation, Increased Vendor Diversification Options, Increased ROI, Increased Organizational Agility, Reduced IT Burden

Related SOA Patterns

Asynchronous Queuing, Capability Composition, Capability Recomposition, Compatible Change, Compensating Service Transaction, Concurrent Contracts, Contract Centralization, Contract Denormalization, Data Format Transformation, Decoupled Contract, Dual Protocols, Entity Abstraction, Event-Driven Messaging, File Gateway, Intermediate Routing, Inventory Endpoint, Legacy Wrapper, Messaging Metadata, Multi-Channel Endpoint, Partial Validation, Policy Centralization, Process Abstraction, Proxy Capability, Schema Centralization, Service Agent, Service Callback, Service Decomposition, Service Facade, Service_instance_routing, Service Messaging, Service Perimeter Guard, Service Refactoring, Trusted Subsystem, UI Mediator, Utility Abstraction, Validation Abstraction

The Prentice Hall Service-Oriented Computing Series from Thomas Erl
Home    SOA Books    SOA Magazine    SOA School    What is SOA?    SOA Patterns    SOA Methodology    SOA Glossary    SOA Specs    Legal
Copyright © 2007-2009 SOA Systems Inc.